Negative transverse maxillary discrepancy and associated factors in patients requiring orthognathic surgery

Authors

Keywords:

orthognathic surgery, maxillomandibular anomalies, transverse maxillary discrepancy.

Abstract

Introduction: Transverse discrepancy of the arches is a skeletal problem not sufficiently studied in persons requiring surgical orthodontic treatment.

Objective: Characterize patients with negative transverse maxillary discrepancy requiring surgical orthognathic surgery.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted of 25 medical records of patients attending the maxillofacial surgery service at Hermanos Ameijeiras Clinical Surgical Hospital with negative transverse maxillary discrepancy requiring orthognathic surgery from January 2016 to January 2020. The cases were studied with qualitative variables divided into epidemiological, facial features and dental measurements. Analysis was based on statistical charts. The summary measurements used were absolute and relative frequencies.

Results: The frequency of negative maxillary discrepancy was 13.3%. White skin patients were more commonly affected (80%). The main concern was aesthetic (68%). Lower third asymmetry and a concave profile were present in 44% and 36% of the cases, respectively. A high frequency was observed of patients with an augmented lower third (76%), posterior crossbite (48%), anterior open bite (75%), lower arch crowding (63.3%) and lower incisor lingualization (72%).

Conclusions: Negative transverse maxillary discrepancy is common among patients requiring orthognathic surgery for large aesthetic alterations. White skin patients were found to be more prone to present this disorder.

Downloads

References

McNamaraa JA. Maxillary transverse deficiency. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 117(5):[556-9 pp.]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70202-2.

Consolaro A, Consolaro RB. Jaws can be referred to as narrow or hypoplastic, but the term "atresia" is inaccurate! Dental press journal of orthodontics [Internet]. 2018 Sep-Oct [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 23(5):[aprox. 5 p.]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266315/.

De Clerck HJ, Proffit WR. Growth modification of the face: A current perspective with emphasis on Class III treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 148(1):[aprox. 10 p.]. Available from: https://www.ajodo.org/article/S0889-5406(15)00530-2/fulltext.

Mulett Vásquez J, Calvijo Escobar AF, Fuentes Loyo I, Sánchez Cano PA. Correlation between tansverse maxillary discrepancy and the inclination of first permanent molars. A pilot study. Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 28(2):[aprox. 20 p.]. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-246X2017000100354&nrm=iso.

Gregoret J, Tuber E, Escobar P LH, Matos da Fonseca A. Ortodoncia y cirugía ortognática. Barcelona: ESPAXS,SA; 1997.

Scariot R, Costa DJd, Barbosa Rebellato NL, Müller PR, Conceição Ferreira Rd. Epidemiological analysis of orthognathic surgery in a hospital in Curitiba, Brazil: Review of 195 cases. Revista Española de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 32(4):[aprox. 5 p.]. Available from: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-05582010000400001&nrm=iso.

Eslamipour F, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Le BT, Shahmoradi M. A Retrospective Analysis of Dentofacial Deformities and Orthognathic Surgeries. Ann Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 7(1):[aprox. 5 p.]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502519/.

Arboleda-Ariza N, Schilling J, Arriola-Guillén LE, Ruíz-Mora GA, Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA, Aliaga-Del Castillo A. Maxillary transverse dimensions in subjects with and without impacted canines: A comparative cone-beam computed tomography study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 154(4):[aprox. 9 p.]. Available from: https://www.ajodo.org/article/S0889-5406(18)30489-X/fulltext.

Shankar S, Madhavan Nirmal R, Aswathnarayanan MB, Kruthika M, Fathima MA. Sex determination using maxillary arch width of pediatric population of Namakkal district, India: A forensic study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 23(3):[aprox 9 p.]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6948034/.

ONEI. Censo de población y vivienda. Informe nacional. La Habana: UNFPA; 2013.

Burris BG, Harris EF. Maxillary Arch Size and Shape in American Blacks and Whites. The Angle Orthodontist [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 70(4):[aprox. 6 p.]. Available from: https://meridian.allenpress.com/angle-orthodontist/article/70/4/297/57583/Maxillary-Arch-Size-and-Shape-in-American-Blacks.

Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Fayed MS, Labib A, El-Saaidi C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: A systematic review. Dental press journal of orthodontics [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 23(6):[aprox. 10 p.]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6340198/.

Garvill J, Garvill H, Kahnberg K-E, Lundgren S. Psychological factors in orthognathic surgery. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery [Internet]. 1992 [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 20(1):[aprox. 6 p.]. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518205801933.

Thiesen G, Gribel BF, Kim KB, Pereira KCR, Freitas MPM. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Mandibular Asymmetry in an Adult Population. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Dic 17]; 28(3):[aprox. 5 p.]. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/Fulltext/2017/05000/Prevalence_and_Associated_Factors_of_Mandibular.78.aspx.

Thiesen G, Gribel BF, Freitas MPM, Oliver DR, Kim KB. Mandibular asymmetries and associated factors in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients. The Angle Orthodontist [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Dic 17]; 88(5):[aprox. 7 p.]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29667467/.

Plaza SP, Reimpell A, Silva J, Montoya D. Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern. Dental press journal of orthodontics [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 24(4):[aprox. 10 p.]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733235/.

Lee J-Y, Han S-H, Ryu H-S, Lee H-M, Kim S-C. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of transverse dental compensation in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry. Korean journal of orthodontics [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 48(6):[aprox. 10 p.]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234112/.

Forster CM, Sunga E, Chung C-H. Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults. European Journal of Orthodontics [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 30(3):[aprox. 7 p.]. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ejo/article/30/3/288/403683.

Hsu BS. The nature of arch width difference and palatal depth of the anterior open bite. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 113(3):[aprox. 7 p.]. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540698703075.

Alvarez-Solarte H, Sierra-Alzate V, Sánchez-Garzón J, Botero-Mariaca P. Palate shape and size and palatal rugae morphology of children with anterior open bite and normal vertical overbite. J Forensic Odontostomatol [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Jul 22]; 36(1):[aprox. 10 p.]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195941/

Published

2022-04-14

How to Cite

1.
García Menéndez M, Perdomo Gutiérrez L. Negative transverse maxillary discrepancy and associated factors in patients requiring orthognathic surgery. Rev Cubana Estomatol [Internet]. 2022 Apr. 14 [cited 2025 Apr. 1];59(2):e3911. Available from: https://revestomatologia.sld.cu/index.php/est/article/view/3911

Issue

Section

Research Article