Shear bond strength of different bonding agents to dental metal alloys
Keywords:
ceramic-metal alloys, adhesive dental coating, shear strength, dental cement.Abstract
Introduction: The bonding of indirect restorations is one of the most important steps, in order to achieve adequate retention and sealing of the interface between the restorative material and the tooth.
Objective: To evaluate the shear bond strength of different bonding agents to two metal alloys used in dentistry.
Methods: In vitro experimental study. One hundred specimens of base metal alloys, 50 nickel-chromium and 50 nickel-chromium-titanium were prepared and randomly divided into 5 groups. This division was made according to the bonding agent used: two-step self-etching system (Clearfil SE Bond; CSB), universal adhesive system (Single Bond Universal; SBU), self-adhesive resin cement (Maxcem Elite; ME), glass ionomer (IV) and zinc phosphate (ZnPO). After the application of each bonding agent, the treated specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hr at 37 ºC and subjected to a shear bond strength test.
Results: Shear bond strength was significantly influenced by the type of bonding agent (p = 0.002) and the type of alloy used (p < 0.001). Shear bond strength was highest when using the Clearfil SE Bond system, followed by Single Bond Universal; the differences between Maxcem Elite and Zinc Phosphate were not significant. Finally, IV did not show adhesion to any of the metal alloys used.
Conclusions: The use of Clearfil SE Bond increased the bond strength of resinous cements to metallic alloys.
Downloads
References
Aslam A, Hassan SH, Nayyer M, Ahmed B. Intraoral repair protocols for fractured metal-ceramic restorations-Literature review. South African Dental Journal. 2018;73(1):35–41.
Yadav JS, Dabas N, Bhargava A, Malhotra P, Yadav B, Sehgal M. Comparing two intraoral porcelain repair systems for shear bond strength in repaired cohesive and adhesive fractures, for porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations: An in vitro study. The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2019;19(4):362.
Nima G, Ferreira PVC, Paula AB de, Consani S, Giannini M. Effect of metal primers on bond strength of a composite resin to nickel-chrome metal alloy. Brazilian dental journal. 2017;28(2):210–5.
Abduo J, Sambrook RJ. Longevity of ceramic onlays: A systematic review. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2018;30(3):193–215.
Cuevas-Suárez CE, de Oliveira da Rosa WL, Vitti RP, da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta‐Analysis of in Vitro Studies. Journal of Prosthodontics [Internet]. 2020 Apr 5;29(4):298–308. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jopr.13147
Hopp CD, Land MF. Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: A review. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. 2013;5:21–32.
Wingo K. A review of dental cements. Journal of veterinary dentistry. 2018;35(1):18–27.
Nikaido T, Tagami J, Yatani H, Ohkubo C, Nihei T, Koizumi H, et al. Concept and clinical application of the resin-coating technique for indirect restorations. Dental materials journal. 2018;2017–253.
Suksaphar W, Banomyong D, Jirathanyanatt T, Ngoenwiwatkul Y. Survival rates against fracture of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with full-coverage crowns or resin composite restorations: a systematic review. Restorative dentistry & endodontics. 2017;42(3):157–67.
Heboyan AG, Vardanyan AR, Avetisyan AA. Cement selection in dental practice. World Science. 2019;2(3 (43)):4–9.
Klosa K, Meyer G, Kern M. Clinically used adhesive ceramic bonding methods: a survey in 2007, 2011, and in 2015. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2016;20(7):1691–8.
Hill EE. Dental cements for definitive luting: a review and practical clinical considerations. Dental Clinics of North America. 2007;51(3):643–58.
Rezaie HR, Rizi HB, Khamseh MMR, Öchsner A. Dental restorative materials. In: A Review on Dental Materials. Springer; 2020. p. 47–171.
Sita Ramaraju D v, Alla RK, Alluri VR, Raju M. A review of conventional and contemporary luting agents used in dentistry. American Journal of Materials Science and Engineering. 2014;2(3):28–35.
Imamura N, Kawaguchi T, Shimizu H, Takahashi Y. Effect of three metal priming agents on the bond strength of adhesive resin cement to Ag-Zn-Sn-In alloy and component metals. Dental materials journal. 2017;37(2):301–7.
Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques Ferreira M, Marto CM, Paula A, Coelho AS. 10-MDP based dental adhesives: Adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability—A systematic review. Materials. 2019;12(5):790.
Valente LLLL, Sarkis-Onofre R, Gonçalves APAP, Fernández E, Loomans B, Moraes RRRR, et al. Repair bond strength of dental composites: systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2016;69(September):15–26.
Ahmed MH, Yao C, van Landuyt K, Peumans M, van Meerbeek B. Extra Bonding Layer Compensates Universal Adhesive’s Thin Film Thickness. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(5):483–501.
Al-Helou H, Swed E. Effect of metal type and surface treatment on shear bond strength of resin cement (in vitro study). The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2016;16(1).
Naghili A, Talebi S, Amirifar H. Universal adhesives: A literature review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research [Internet]. 2018;10(4):860–72. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85063529133&partnerID=40&md5=751da630b2bd8992fd301840e1976492
dos Santos RA, de Lima EA, Mendonça LS, de Oliveira JE, Rizuto AV, de Araújo Silva Tavares ÁF, et al. Can universal adhesive systems bond to zirconia? Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2019;31(6):589–94.
Raeisosadat F, Ghoveizi R, Eskandarion S, Beyabanaki E, Tavakolizadeh S. Influence of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of resin cement to base metal alloys. Journal of lasers in medical sciences. 2020;11(1):45.
Shafiei F, Behroozibakhsh M, Abbasian A, Shahnavazi S. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to base metal alloys having different surface treatments. Dental research journal. 2018;15(1):63.
Gryksa M, Eriksson M, de Basso N, Shen Z. Phosphate dental cements aged in vivo up to 25 years. Advances in Applied Ceramics. 2020;119(5–6):338–47.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain all rights to their works, which they can reproduce and distribute as long as they cite the primary source of publication.
The Rev Cubana Estomatol is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) and follows the publication model of SciELO Publishing Schema (SciELO PS) for publication in XML format.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Download PDF
