Tensile bond strength of fiberglass and anatomized posts
Keywords:
adhesion, fiberglass pins, fiberglass post, bond strength, tensile strength.Abstract
Introduction: Fiberglass posts often fall off their position due to loss of adhesive capacity when they are subjected to masticatory force.
Objective: Compare in vitro the tensile bond strength of fiberglass and anatomized posts cemented with the same adhesive material.
Methods: An in vitro experimental study was conducted. A selection was made of 20 premolars extracted by orthodontic indication which were then randomly distributed into two groups. The premolars underwent root canal treatment by a specialist. The preparation was manual and sealing was performed by lateral condensation. The teeth were prepared in the standard manner to receive the fiberglass and resin-anatomized posts. In both groups’ cementation followed the protocol suggested by the manufacturer of Allcem Core® (dual cement). The specimens were stamped in self-curing acrylic. Next, they were subjected to vertical tensile strength in an materials testing machine (Instrom©).
Results: The mean values obtained were 31 kg/F for teeth with anatomized posts and 12.47 kg/F for fiberglass posts. According to Shapiro-Wilk tests, the samples exhibited a normal distribution (p > 0.05). The hypothesis was contrasted with Student’s t test, obtaining a highly significant statistical difference between the groups (p = 0.001).
Conclusions: Vertical tensile bond strength is greater in anatomized posts.
Downloads
References
Moradas M. Reconstrucción del diente endodonciado con postes colados o espigas de fibra: revisión bibliográfica. Avances en Odontoestomatología. 2016 [acceso: 22/02/2020]; 32(6):317-21. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-12852016000600004&lang=es
Correa S, Isaza JF, Sol A, Naranjo M. Resistencia de dientes restaurados con postes prefabricados ante cargas de máxima intercuspidación, masticación y bruxismo. Revista Cubana de Estomatología. 2013 [acceso: 22/02/2020]; 50(1):53-69. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0034-75072013000100000&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
Ruiz M, Pardo MF, Jaimes G, Muñoz E, Palma JE. Fracture Resistance of fiberglass post vs cast post in anterior teeth. Systematic review. CES Odontología. 2016 [acceso: 22/02/2020]; 29(1):45-56. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0120-971X2016000100006&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es
Calabria HF. Postes prefabricados de fibra. Consideraciones para su uso clínico. Revista Odontoestomatología. 2010 [acceso: 22/02/2020]; 12(Suppl 16):4-22. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/pdf/ode/v12s16/v12s16a02.pdf
Bohrer TC, Fontana PE, Wandscher VF, Morari VHC, Pillar R, Bello M de C, et al. Endodontic sealers and post-endodontic waiting time affect the bond strength of the fiber posts. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP. 2020;49(1). DOI: 10.1590/1807-2577.00120
Pignata S, Vola J, Buchtik N. Técnica del Poste Anatómico (Grandini): Caso clínico. Odontoestomatología. 2012 [acceso: 22/02/2020]; 14(19):4-13. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1688-93392012000100000&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
Macchiavello C, Magasich C, Peña F. Preparación Ultrasónica del Espacio Protésico y su Influencia en la Resistencia Adhesiva de Postes de Fibroresina en Conductos Ovalados. Int J Odontostomat. 2020 [acceso: 22/02/2020]; 14(1):109-16. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2020000100109
Talaveira RA, Coutinho M, Igor P, Alves L, Roberto J. Conventional dual-cure versus self-adhesive resin cements in dentin bond integrity. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2011;19(4):355-62.
Miguelena KE, Guerrero J, Garcilazo A, Ríos E. Análisis de resistencia al desplazamiento de dos cementos de resina, en dentina intrarradicular. Revista odontológica mexicana. 2016;20(4):238-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.rodmex.2016.11.003
Marquez JN, Gonzalez CB, Silva EM, Pereira GD, Simao RA, Prado M. Análise comparativa da resistência de união de um cimento convencional e um cimento autoadesivo após diferentes tratamentos na superfície de pinos de fibra de vidro. 2016 [acceso: 22/02/2020]; 45(2):121-6. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.br/j/rounesp/a/qZ9nJVTBYCfTjfmWm4V53KR/?format=pdf&lang=pt
Tulga A, Ayşe F, Ömür D. Does Sterilization Affect the Push Out Bond Strength of Experimental Dentin Posts? Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences. 2019;21(2):63-72. DOI: 10.15517/ijds.v0i0.36506
Moreno J, Vivas JC, Campo IC, Garzón H. Evaluation of push-out bond strength in fiberglass posts cemented in natural teeth using different cementation protocols. Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia. 2016;27(2):296-321. DOI: 10.17533/udea.rfo.v27n2a4
Calixto LR, Rodrigues M, Coelho Bandéca M, Fernandez E, Chaple AM, Alves de Campos E, et al. Pretratamiento y mejoría de la fuerza de unión de los cementos autoadhesivos de resina a los postes. Revista Cubana de Estomatología. 2019 [acceso: 15/03/2020]; 56(3). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0034-75072019000300003&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=en
Dominguez S, Castillo D, Ramos O, Rozas A. Evaluación de la resistencia adhesiva entre el poste de fibra de vidrio y el muñón de resina utilizando diferentes tratamientos de superficie. Revista Estomatológica Herediana. 2017;27(3):153-162. DOI: 10.20453/reh.v27i3.3199
Alava Freire M, Mena N, Sandoval F. Evaluación de la interfase de adhesión-cohesión entre el poste de fibra de vidrio, cemento dual y dentina, previa irrigación con 2 sustancias desinfectantes. Revista odontológica mexicana. 2012 [acceso: 15/03/2020];
(3):182-7. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-199X2012000300005&lang=es
Conte T, Andrade GS de, Gadonski AP, Santin DC, Naufel FS. Evaluation of the effect of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite in adhesive cementation of fiber posts - in vitro study. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP. 2019;48(1). DOI: 10.1590/1807-2577.02019
Borges M de F, Teixeira GS, Montagner AF, Susin AH. Glass fiber post treatment – does it influence resin cement bond strength? Revista de Odontologia da UNESP. 2019;48(1). DOI: 10.1590/1807-2577.03219
Lopes T, Pino R, Miranda ME, Brandt WC. Effect of Glass Fiber Post Adaptation on Push-Out Bond Strength to Root Dentin. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2019;30(4):350-5. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201902491
Ross D, Filloy CE, Ramírez JC. Resistencia de unión del sistema de postes REBILDA® con la dentina intrarradicular. Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences. 2017;19(2):47-59. DOI: 10.15517/ijds.v0i0.28742
Bakaus TE, Gruber YL, Reis A, Mongruel OM, Mongruel G. Bond strength values of fiberglass post to flared root canals reinforced with different materials. Brazilian Oral Research. 2018;32(1). DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0013
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain all rights to their works, which they can reproduce and distribute as long as they cite the primary source of publication.
The Rev Cubana Estomatol is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) and follows the publication model of SciELO Publishing Schema (SciELO PS) for publication in XML format.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.