SatisfactionService Post-Orthodontic University Santo Tomas According ToLean-Six-Sigma Metrics
Keywords:
Quality of care, Lean-Six-Sigma, Orthodontics, Patient satisfactionAbstract
Introduction: The Lean-Six-Sigma methodology is currently used in the health area in order to improve the quality and competitiveness of services; but there are still no reports of its use in the orthodontic area.
Objective: to determine the post-orthodontic satisfaction by means of sigma levels of the patients who attend a teaching-assistance clinic in Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Methods: Observational descriptive cross-sectional study. Population: 100 patients (female and male) who finish orthodontic treatment. Sample selection method: the entire population that had completed the treatment between July 2017 and June 2018 was selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. A telephone survey of 17 questions and seven dimensions of satisfaction was carried out. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated with the internal consistency of the questionnaire by means of the Cronbach's alpha in which 0.87 was obtained, and the Lawshe method was used for validity. The Lean-Six-Sigma methodology was used to assess the quality of satisfaction; Results are presented in percentage and sigma levels.
Results: The quality of service satisfaction was 91.27% (conventionally measured) and 1.36 sigmas; in the group of 16 to 19 years it was 93.6% and 1.52 sigmas; and for the group over 27 years old, 84.9% and 1.03 sigma. The female sex reported 88.57% and 1.2 sigmas, and the male reported 93.46% with 1.51 sigmas.
Conclusions: The satisfaction results in orthodontics, measured by conventional methods, showed acceptable percentages, but showed incompetent results when measured with sigma levels, which indicates that there are hidden problems to be identified and that they would correspond to a subsequent investigation.
Downloads
References
Porter ME, Lee TH. From Volume to Value in Health Care. JAMA. 2016 [acceso: 15/11/2019]; 316(10). Disponible en: https://www.waportal.org/sites/default/files/resources/From%20Volume%20to%20Value.pdf
Dianis NL, Wolbach TL, Spiegelman M. The NHLBI-UnitedHealth Global Health Centers of Excellence Program: Assessment of Impact of Federal Funding Through a Social Network Analysis. Glob Heart. 2016;11(1). PMCID: PMC4843133
Jayasinha Y. Decreasing Turnaround Time and Increasing Patient Satisfaction in a Safety Net Hospital-Based Pediatrics Clinic Using Lean Six Sigma Methodologies. Qual Manag Health Care. 2016;25(1). PMID: 26783866
Van Leijen-Zeelenberg JE, Elissen AMJ, Grube K, van Raak AJA, Vrijhoef HJM, Kremer B, et al. The impact of redesigning care processes on quality of care: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;19(3). PMCID: PMC4717535
Pachêco-Pereira C, Pereira JR, Dick BD, Perez A. Factors associated with patient and parent satisfaction after orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 [acceso: 06/01/2020]; 48(4). Disponible en: https://www.ajodo.org/article/S0889-5406(15)00775-1/pdf
Wong L, Ryan FS, Christensen LR, Cunningham SJ. Factors influencing satisfaction with the process of orthodontic treatment in adult patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2018;153(3). PMID: 29501111
Pachêco-Pereira C, Abreu LG, Dick BD, De Luca Canto G, Paiva, SM, Flores-Mir C. Patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery: A systematic review. The Angle Orthodontist. 2016;86(3). PMID: 26313228
Burzynski JA, Firestone AR, Beck FM, Fields HW, Deguchi T. Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2018;153(4). PMID: 29602345
Torres G, Leon R. Nivel de satisfaccion de los pacientes atendidos en el servicio de ortodoncia de una clinica dental docente peruana. Rev Estomatol Herediana. 2015[acceso: 09/02/2020]; 25(2). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/reh/v25n2/a05v25n2.pdf
Li W, Wang S, Zhang Y. Relationships among satisfaction, treatment motivation, and expectations in orthodontic patients: a prospective cohort study. Patient Preference and Adherence. 2016;10. PMCID: PMC4831590
Godley M, Jenkins JB. Decreasing wait times and increasing patient satisfaction: A Lean Six Sigma approach. J Nurs Care Qual. 2018;34(1). PMID: 29889720
Deblois S, Lepanto L. Lean and Six Sigma in acute care: A systematic review of reviews. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016;29(2). PMID: 26959898
Ciulla TA, Tatikonda MV, ElMaraghi YA, Hussain RM, Hill AL, Clary JM, et al. Lean Six Sigma techniques to improve ophthalmology clinic efficiency. Retina. 2018;38(9). PMID: 28723845
Molla M, Warren DS, Stewart SL, Stocking J, Johl H, Sinigayan V. Lean Six Sigma Quality Improvement Project Improves Timeliness of Discharge from the Hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 [acceso: 01/02/2020]; 44(7). Disponible en: https://www.jointcommissionjournal.com/article/S1553-7250(17)30392-6/pdf
Chugani N, Kumar V, Garza-Reyes JA, Rocha-Lona L, Upadhyay A. Investigating the green impact of Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. 2017 [acceso: 16/10/2019]; 8(1). Disponible en: https://derby.openrepository.com/handle/10545/605693
O’Rourke P. A multiple-case analysis of lean six sigma deployment and implementation strategies. Ohio: Air Force Institute of Technology; 2005. [acceso: 10/11/2019]. Disponible en: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a437541.pdf
Chávez CA. Calidad de atención del servicio de odontología de La Universidad de San Martín de Porres [Tesis de Maestría]. [Lima]: Universidad San Martín de Porres; 2016. [acceso: 09/05/2020]. Disponible en: http://200.37.16.212/bitstream/handle/usmp/2579/CHAVEZ_CA.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
EbnAhmady A, Pakkhesal M, Zafarmand AH, Lando HA. Patient satisfaction surveys in dental school clinics: a review and comparison. J DentEduc. 2015 [acceso: 25/01/2020]; 79(4). Disponible en: http://www.jdentaled.org/content/jde/79/4/388.full.pdf
George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003. [acceso: 03/12/2019]. Disponible en: https://wps.ablongman.com/wps/media/objects/385/394732/george4answers.pdf
Lawshe C. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology. 1975 [acceso: 09/11/2019]; 28(4). Disponible en: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.460.9380&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain all rights to their works, which they can reproduce and distribute as long as they cite the primary source of publication.
The Rev Cubana Estomatol is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) and follows the publication model of SciELO Publishing Schema (SciELO PS) for publication in XML format.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.