Assessment of dental injuries by forensic odontology experts from the Legal Medicine Institute, Brazil

Authors

  • Christiano Sampaio Queiroz Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto – USP
  • Rodrigo Galo Departamento de Odontologia, Faculdade de Ciências Biológicas e Saúde – Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9195-7689
  • Marta Regina Pinheiro Flores Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto – USP
  • Adrielly Garcia Ortiz Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto – USP
  • Ricardo Henrique Alves da Silva Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto – USP

Keywords:

forensic odontology, tooth, wounds and injuries, expert testimony.

Abstract

Introduction: Article 129 of the Brazilian Penal Code defines the crime of bodily harm as damage to the physical integrity or the health of others. Penalties for this crime are graded in keeping with the consequences of the injury, determined by forensic examination indicated by the corresponding authority. Dental injuries are common in this type of examination, and analysis of results based on the Brazilian Penal Code is the object of frequent debate among forensic experts, with many divergences between the various examiners.
Objective: Analyze the penal interpretation of injuries to upper front teeth provided by official forensic odontology experts from Nina Rodrigues Forensic Institute (Salvador, Bahia, Brazil).
Methods: Analysis was conducted of 2 738 expert reports issued in the five-year period extending from January 2007 to December 2011. The inclusion criterion was description of injury to permanent upper front teeth, whereas the exclusion criterion was lack of certainty as to the consequences of the injury specified. Data were gathered by a single individual, who had access to the reports. The dental injuries described in the reports were classified and encoded to facilitate annotation and the performance of statistical studies based on chi-square estimation and the kappa test (R software version 2.15.2, R Core Development Team, 2012) (p≥ 0.05).
Results: Of the 2 738 reports, 277 met the inclusion criterion. Of the injuries described therein, 32.16 % were classified as simple dental crown fractures, 31.72 % as complex fractures, and 36.12 % as avulsions. Results show the close relationship between forensic experts and criminal investigators in the analysis of dental injuries.
Conclusions: Penal assessment of dental injuries was markedly subjective, requiring further study and discussion to minimize such subjectivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2018-05-02

How to Cite

1.
Queiroz CS, Galo R, Flores MRP, Ortiz AG, Alves da Silva RH. Assessment of dental injuries by forensic odontology experts from the Legal Medicine Institute, Brazil. Rev Cubana Estomatol [Internet]. 2018 May 2 [cited 2025 Feb. 23];55(1):2-8. Available from: https://revestomatologia.sld.cu/index.php/est/article/view/1196

Issue

Section

Research Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.